Would this be doable in the new codebase? Either way it should be a separate issue. While it's really really awesome that React 16 now handles, if we want a really great story around noscript, I’d say automatically removing nested noscript-tags as per suggestion in Nested renders invalid HTML #6204 is key.The proposed solution to ignore the content of noscript-tags on the client is perfect (as long as we still keep the existing content in them).This is going to be about the popular NoScript extension which. However, the developer of the NoScript extension has now moved to aggressively make money using unacceptable techniques. If you don’t want to see a lot of advertising in your web browser you have probably installed AdBlockPlus. (If JS crashes before bucket has been set - Catch error and replace all relevant noscript-tags with divs and set their innerHTML with the innerHTML of the noscript-tag) Remove NoScript from your Firefox here is why.Use dangerouslySetInnerHTML with the above.Instead of renderToStaticMarkup - Read existing textContent/innerHTML of the noscript-tag.Remove all nested noscript-tags in the resulting string (quite common for us since we also use noscript-fallbacks for lazy-loaded images).Render default component with renderToStaticMarkup (including using a couple of Providers to make Redux and react-router work).It could be as easy as but to make this work fully we have had to: 4th May 2009 By Greg Ferro Filed Under: Blog If you don’t want to see a lot of advertising in your web browser you have probably installed AdBlockPlus. Providing a noscript-fallback for conditional functionality that is determined on the client might be a bit niche but shouldn’t be that uncommon either. Often we still want to provide a default variant (in a noscript-tag) for people without JS, or as graceful degradation in cases where JS has crashed. If we do, maybe we could introduce a new JS Tracking Code option (checkbox) to let users add the
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |